TAKE HOME MESSAGE
Developing a preventive foot care program provides a valuable
service for clients and their horses. By raising awareness of
existing problems, or the potential for certain problems to
develop in a particular horse, steps can be taken to limit the
impact of those problems and prolong the horse's useful life.
INTRODUCTION
The two conventional preventive medicine programs in equine
practice are deworming and vaccination. These programs are
designed to prevent, or at least decrease the incidence and
severity of, specific medical problems. As the fields of
equine parasitology and immunology have advanced, so these
preventive programs have been refined. Now, deworming and
vaccination programs are tailored for particular types of
horses, management situations, and geographic regions. These
programs are now so widely accepted that, even if a horse
owner or manager has limited knowledge of the specific
parasites or diseases involved, most are convinced of the
importance and value of these preventive medicine programs.
But preventive health care need not be restricted to deworming
and vaccination. There are numerous performance-limiting
problems in horses that can be prevented, or their incidence
and severity reduced, simply by alerting the owner or manager
to the potential for a particular horse to develop that
problem and recommending appropriate management changes. This
is the foundation of the preventive foot care program we
describe in this paper.
Foot problems are among the most common causes of lameness in
horses. Thus, the primary objective of this preventive foot
care program is to avoid potentially serious foot problems and
limit progression of existing problems, thereby maximizing
performance and prolonging the useful life of the horse. This
goal is achieved by making the owner aware of any potential or
existing foot problems, providing the farrier with a lateral
radiograph from which to make shoeing decisions, and
encouraging positive interaction among the owner-farrier-veterinarian
team (OFVT). This paper describes the preventive foot care
program we have developed for our practice, and presents the
findings from the first 50 horses evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Examination Procedure
Fifty horses were evaluated between August 1998 and January
1999. To be eligible, the horse had to be sound for work, as
determined by the owner. Horses that were lame were excluded
from the study group, and their owners were encouraged to have
a standard lameness examination performed.
The preventive foot care examination comprises five parts:
1. History-The owner or manager is asked to provide general
information about the horse and its work schedule, any history
of foot problems or lameness, and the shoeing schedule (Fig.
1).
2. General inspection-The horse's conformation is briefly
evaluated and its body score is estimated.1 The
potential for suspensory ligament problems (e.g. long pasterns
and exaggerated fetlock hyperextension when walking, pain on
palpation of the suspensory ligament) is also assessed.
3. Assessment of the feet-Both forefeet are examined with the
shoes on (if applicable). Foot conformation is evaluated, and
the feet are inspected for any obvious external problems such
as cracks, other hoof wall defects, and thrush. Two simple
measurements are then made: (a) hoof wall angle (angle of the
dorsal hoof wall relative to the bearing surface of the foot),
and (b) hoof width, measured across the widest part of the
foot.
4. Lateral radiographs-A lateral radiograph is taken of each
forefoot, with the horizontal beam aimed at the bearing
surface of the hoof wall and centered at the junction between
the middle and palmar thirds of the shoe. Every effort is made
to take a "true lateral" radiograph, in which both branches of
the shoe are superimposed.
The lateral radiograph is primarily used to evaluate the
position of the shoe in relation to the center of the coffin
joint (i.e. heel support). Other evaluations include sole
thickness, the position of the third phalanx (PIII) in
relation to the hoof capsule, and the presence of any bony or
soft tissue abnormalities visible on this view.
To evaluate heel support, a vertical line is extended down
from the center of the coffin joint to intersect with the shoe
(Fig 2.). The center of the coffin joint is determined to be
the point midway along the curvature of the distal
interphalangeal joint, between the proximal extent of PIII's
extensor process and the proximal extent of the dorsal
articular surface of the navicular bone. A calculation is then
made of what proportion of the shoe is in front of this line
(toward the toe) and what proportion is behind this line
(toward the heel). Heel support is considered adequate when
>40% of the shoe is behind this line.
5. Report. Once the radiographs have been evaluated, a written
report is sent to the owner and the farrier (and, when
applicable, the primary or referring veterinarian). Included
in the report are a summary of the general inspection and hoof
measurements, details of any radiographic abnormalities found,
a tracing of the lateral radiograph with the assessment of
heel support, and any specific recommendations for shoeing,
turnout, diet, and exercise. The owner is encouraged to have
the evaluation repeated every 12 months.
Evaluation of the Program
In an effort to determine the practical value of such a
program, a subjective score was given for each preventive foot
care evaluation:
0 = feet appeared normal and no new information was
gleaned
1 = foot/feet had some abnormality that was already
being addressed by the OFVT
2 = one minor problem either unknown or not being
addressed by the OFVT
3 = combination of minor problems either unknown or
not addressed by the OFVT
4 = moderate problem unknown to the OFVT that may be
asymptomatic but should be monitored
5 = serious problem of immediate concern, unknown to
the OFVT
Specific abnormalities found during the evaluation that we
considered to be, or have the potential to become, a problem
were also compiled.
RESULTS
In evaluating the program, the following results were obtained
for each subjective score:
0 - In 5 of the 50 horses (10%), the feet and radiographs were
considered normal, and no member of the OFVT learned anything
new about the horse.
1 - In 12 horses (24%), the problem was known to the members
of the OFVT, and no new problems were identified. The
evaluation simply confirmed the presence and extent of the
problem, which in most horses was mismatched feet.
2 - In 20 horses (40%), a minor problem that was either
unknown or not being addressed by the OFVT was identified. The
most common problems in this category were inadequate heel
support in one or both feet, excessive body weight (body score
>7 on a scale from 1 to 9), and a level or inversely angled
coffin bone (loss of the normal tilt to the solar margin of
PIII such that it is either level or lower at the wings than
at the toe).
3 - In 8 horses (16%) a combination of minor problems unknown
or not being addressed by the OFVT were found. The types of
problems identified were the same as those listed for horses
with a score of 2; one horse in this group had mild coffin
bone rotation.
4 - In 4 horses (8%) a problem of moderate importance was
found. Problems in this group included ringbone (currently
asymptomatic), coffin bone rotation, and suspensory ligament
pain.
5 - One horse had an important problem of immediate concern.
This horse was tripping and falling as a result of advanced
carpal arthritis, of which the owner and farrier were unaware.
The most common finding that we considered to be a
potential problem was mismatched feet (Table 1). In most
horses, the mismatching was mild to moderate. The next most
common finding was excessive body weight. Horses with cresty
necks were included it this group, regardless of their body
score. Another relatively common finding was inadequate heel
support, defined radiographically as <40% of the shoe being
positioned behind the center of the coffin joint. Seven horses
had what we believe is a propensity for suspensory problems in
the hindlimbs, based on their conformation and exaggerated
fetlock hyperextension while walking. In three of these
horses, pain was elicited on palpation of the suspensory
ligaments. Other less common findings included thin soles,
ringbone, and coffin bone rotation; these abnormalities were
identified on the lateral radiographs.
DISCUSSION
In this small sample of 50 horses, 66% had potential problems
that were not known or were not being addressed by the owner,
farrier, or primary care veterinarian. In only 10% of horses
were the feet and lateral radiographs considered normal. In
our experience, the problems identified through this program
have the potential to negatively impact performance and even
cause lameness if not managed appropriately. Thus, we believe
that a preventive foot care program such as this is a valuable
service for clients and their horses.
Our preventive foot care program is still evolving, but it has
been well received by owners and farriers in our area. The
most common problems or misconceptions that we have
encountered so far are that the program is a critique of the
farrier's work, a comprehensive physical and radiographic
evaluation of the feet, or a substitute for a lameness
examination. But when the goals of the program are made clear
to the owner and the farrier, in most cases all parties have
been pleased with the results and convinced of its value. We
feel that this program offers veterinarians a unique
opportunity to positively interact with the farriers in their
practice area, and work together to manage existing foot
problems and prevent many others.
This preventive foot care program is presented simply as a
model. We anticipate that equine practitioners who adopt this
program will modify the evaluation to fit the types of horses
and most prevalent foot problems seen in their practices. For
example, the examination may need to be modified for gaited
horses shod with elevated pads, and for growing horses; and in
young horses, a practitioner may recommend re-evaluation every
6 months instead of every 12 months. Some veterinarians may
choose to include a dorsopalmar projection or a 'skyline'
navicular view in the radiographic examination, although the
program is designed to be a screening tool that is as
economical and as simple to conduct as possible. Various
methods of evaluating the foot are described elsewhere.2,
3, 4
As our sample size is small and limited to functionally sound
horses, our data do not accurately reflect the incidence of
various foot problems in horses. We did not find any major
foot problems in this population of horses, which is probably
to be expected. However, the main impetus for the principal
author (RAM) to develop this program was the number of cases
in which a program of this type could have prevented a serious
problem, or at least alerted the owner, farrier, or
veterinarian to its presence early enough for simple
management changes to have limited its impact. A fairly common
example is a horse with white line disease in which a lateral
radiograph reveals the presence of coffin bone rotation.
Whether the rotation was primary or secondary is open to
speculation. The fact remains that, had a lateral radiograph
not been taken, the farrier and veterinarian would have been
unaware of the extent of the problem.
Another example that illustrates the value of this program is
the older horse with pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction
(equine Cushing's disease), in which chronic laminitis and
recurrent foot abscesses are common and frustrating problems.
There are many owners and farriers who are unaware of this
medical condition and equally unaware that it can be managed,
and the foot problems substantially improved, with medication.
Below are brief discussions of the potential problems we did
identify in the first 50 horses we evaluated.
Mismatched Feet
Mismatching of the feet was the most common finding. We
quantitatively defined mismatching as a difference in hoof
angle and/or width between the left and right feet of >2
degrees and/or >2 millimeters, respectively. Many of the
owners and all of the farriers were aware of the mismatching
in these horses. However, the preventive foot care evaluation
allowed such issues as the importance of an appropriate
shoeing interval to be addressed by a third party, thus
reinforcing the farrier's recommendations to the owner.
A small amount of inequity between the left and right feet is
probably normal. However, in our experience obvious
mismatching is suggestive of a previous, current, or
developing problem that could affect performance or lead to
lameness if not addressed. The horses we evaluated were all
functionally sound, in the opinion of the owner, but few were
performing at an advanced level in a strenuous sport or
activity. We recommend monitoring mismatched feet for widening
of the difference between the two feet in successive shoeings.
If there is no significant change between shoeings (i.e. the
situation is static) and the horse is performing
satisfactorily, then monitoring the situation may be all that
is needed. But if there is a widening of the difference
between the two feet in successive shoeings, it could indicate
a progressive problem which needs further evaluation.
Overweight Horses
Almost 40% of the horses evaluated were considered to be
overweight (body score of >7). This fact should have been
apparent to the owner, farrier, and veterinarian, but no-one
was addressing this problem. Most equine practitioners would
agree that overweight horses and those with cresty necks are
at increased risk for laminitis, and that excessive body
weight can complicate various other orthopedic problems,
particularly joint disease. Awareness of the potential risk
factors is essential in the prevention of laminitis, so this
preventive foot care program offers farriers and veterinarians
an opportunity to educate their clients and work at
eliminating one of the risk factors for this devastating
disease.
Inadequate Heel Support
Over one-third of the horses had inadequate heel support in
one or both feet. In our collective experience, which spans
two continents and several regions within the US, we believe
that this problem is quite prevalent in various types of
horse. Inadequate heel support may be responsible for many
cases of palmar foot pain (heel pain), whether originating
from the navicular area or elsewhere in the palmar aspect of
the foot. It may also contribute to quarter cracks.
We chose to evaluate heel support radiographically, based on
the method outlined by Chris Colles.4 However, we modified
Colles' approach slightly. Colles describes drawing a circle
through the distal interphalangeal joint and dropping a
vertical line from the center of the circle to the bearing
surface of the foot. Using this method, the line should bisect
the bearing surface if the foot is correctly balanced.4
But rather than drawing a circle over the coffin joint to
determine its center, we simply select a point along the
curvature of the coffin joint that is equidistant between the
most proximal aspects of the extensor process and the dorsal
articular surface of the navicular bone. We then drop a
vertical line from that point to the ground surface (Figure
2). Using this method, we consider heel support to be adequate
in most horses when no more than 60% of the shoe is in front
of this line and no less than 40% of the shoe is behind this
line (i.e. 60:40). A common concern among owners and some
farriers is that the horse is more likely to loosen or pull
off a shoe if the shoe extends back too far. But we have found
that horses shod to provide adequate heel support based on our
criterion of 60:40 are no more likely to lose shoes, provided
attention is paid to breakover and to the environment in which
the horse is kept.
Throughout the program, most farriers have appreciated having
a lateral radiograph (or a tracing) from which to work. It
graphically depicts the problem in a way that most owners can
readily understand, and it helps the farrier determine the
most appropriate shoeing method and shoeing interval. It also
encourages dialogue between the farrier and the veterinarian.
Propensity for Suspensory Problems
Horses with long pasterns tend to have exaggerated
hyperextension of the fetlocks during motion. In some horses,
the pasterns are merely "functionally" long, meaning that
while the pasterns may be of average length, there is still
exaggerated fetlock hyperextension. Typically, horses with
long or functionally long pasterns are considered "good
movers," having a more elastic gait than horses with shorter
or more upright pasterns. However, this conformation may place
undue stress on the suspensory ligaments, as the loading and
length of the suspensory ligament increase with extension of
the fetlock joint.5
Horses with long or functionally long pasterns and exaggerated
fetlock hyperextension may, therefore, be at increased risk
for degenerative suspensory ligament disease (chronic
stretching and fiber damage).6 In the first 50
horses we evaluated, 14% had what we considered to be a
propensity for suspensory ligament problems, based on their
conformation. All cases involved the hindlimbs, and all tended
to have straighter hocks in the stance phase of the stride
than horses considered not to be at increased risk for
suspensory problems. Three of the seven horses had some pain
on palpation of the affected suspensory ligament(s), either in
the body or the branches.
As with excessive body weight, making the owner aware that
such a horse may be at increased risk is an important step in
preventing or limiting this serious condition. In horses with
this propensity, we discuss modifications to the exercise
program with the owner and discuss increasing the heel support
with the farrier.
Radiographic Findings
Two horses in the group had mild coffin bone rotation. Both
horses were asymptomatic at the time of the evaluation, and in
each case the farrier was unaware of the problem. Four horses
in the group had thin soles. Currently, our radiographic
assessment of sole thickness is subjective; we do not
routinely measure sole depth. But in general, we consider a
horse to have thin soles if the distance between the tip of
PIII and the surface of the sole is less than 0.75 cm. In each
of the four horses with thin soles, the farrier was aware of
the fact, but in most cases the farrier found it useful to
have the extent documented on radiographs.
A small proportion of horses had level or inversely angled
coffin bones, in which the normal 4-5 degree tilt of the
coffin bone in relation to the ground surface of the hoof was
lost. None of these horses was lame, but we believe that this
radiographic finding is not normal and signals a potential
problem in the palmar half of the foot. Colles remarked that
this abnormality may be found in horses with very badly
balanced feet. 4 In some horses with level or
inversely angled coffin bones, we have observed some
angulation to be achieved once adequate heel support is
provided.
Degenerative joint disease involving the proximal
interphalangeal joint was identified in three horses. In each
case the condition was clinically silent and unknown to the
members of the OFVT. Although the significance of this finding
is open to debate, we feel that emphasizing the importance of
consistency in the shoeing interval and footing (both exercise
and turnout surfaces) is beneficial in these horses.
In conclusion, we believe that developing a preventive foot
care program, tailored to the types of horses and foot
problems commonly encountered in the practice, provides a
valuable service for clients and their horses. By raising
awareness of existing problems, or the potential for certain
problems to develop in a particular horse, steps can be taken
to limit the impact of those problems and thus prolong the
horse's useful life. This program also provides a novel way of
enhancing the owner-farrier-veterinarian relationship, to the
ultimate benefit of the horse.
REFERENCES
1. Galligan DT. Principles of Nutrition. In: Collahan PT,
Mayhew IG, Merritt AM, and Moore JN, eds. Equine Medicine and
Surgery. 5th edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 1999; 178.
2. Snow V, Birdsall D. Specific parameters used to evaluate
hoof balance and support, in Proceedings. 36th Annu Conv Am
Assoc Equine Practnr 1990; 299-311.
3. Turner T. The use of hoof measurements for the objective
assessment of hoof balance, in Proceedings. 38th Annu Conv Am
Assoc Equine Practnr 1992; 389-394.
4. Colles CM. Interpreting radiographs 1: the foot. Equine
Vet. J. 1983; 15: 297-303.
5. Clayton HM. Effects of hoof angle on locomotion and limb
loading. In: White NA and Moore JN, eds. Current Techniques in
Equine Surgery and Lameness. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: W.B.
Saunders, 1998; 504-509.
6. Young JH. Degenerative suspensory ligament desmitis, in
Proceedings. 4th International Farriery & Lameness Seminar
1994; 34-35.
Figure 1. Sample evaluation form.
| ------------------------------- PREVENTIVE FOOT CARE
PROGRAM---------------------------------- Name
_____________________________ Date
____________________________________
Address ___________________________ Date last shod
_______________________________
Town _____________________________ Horse
_____________________________________
State ______ Zip ___________________ Breed _______ Age
_____ Sex_________HT _______
Phone ____________________________ fax
______________________email ______________
Primary care
veterinarian__________________________________________________________
Farrier
_______________________________________________________________________
Past foot problems*** Cracks Y N- Mild laminitis Y N-
Bruise Y N- White LD Y N-
Chronic heel pain Y N- Thrush Y N- Abscess Y N Unknown
lameness YN
Radiographs Y N ------ Nerve blocks Y N--- Other
_____________________________________________________________________________
Comments
____________________________________________________________________
Environment *** Stall Y N- Sandlot Y N- Pasture Y N- Size
___ac Grass GM P
Exercise goal for your horse? ___________________Average
exercise days/wk________________
Comments_____________________________________________________________________
******************************************************************************
Body conformation - Score ___________ Straight hocks Y N-
Depressed fetlocks Y N- fr't rear
Cresty neck Y N- Overweight Y N- This horse is predisposed
to laminitis Y N
Back tenderness Y N- where
__________________________________________________
Sternal tenderness Y N-________________________________
Foot conformation and shoeing LF ____ degrees & cm RF
____ deg & cm
Matched Y N- if no, then subtle Y N- obvious Y N-
_________________smaller foot R L
Sole - Overconcave Y N- Normal concavity Y N- Flat sole Y
N- Sunken sole Y N -
Quarters - Symmetrical Y N- Straight wall LL, LM, RL, RM-
Wall in LL,LM,RL, RM
Coronet parallel to ground rt Y N- lt Y N-
Heel parallel to the toe Y N - Lands flat rt, Y N- lt, Y
N- Outside 1st rt, lt- Inside 1st rt, lt
Thrush Y N- rt, lt- Frog normal Y N- recessed Y N
Cracks Y N- superficial Y N- rt, lt- toe, quarter deep Y N
- rt,,lt toe, quarter
Other problem
__________________________________________________________________
Summary - notations in italics are potentially more
serious
There is a specific problem (s)
_______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Recommendations________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
|
Figure 2.
Evaluating heel support on a tracing of a lateral
radiograph. The "x" indicates the center of the coffin
joint (a point along the curvature of the joint midway
between the most proximal aspects of the extensor
process and the dorsal articular surface of the
navicular bone). A vertical line is drawn down from this
point to intersect the shoe. At least 40% of the shoe's
length should be behind this line.
|
Table 1. Specific findings of preventive foot care
evaluations on 50 horses.
|
Finding
|
Number of horses
|
Percentage of total
|
|
Mismatched feet
|
27
|
54%
|
|
Overweight*/cresty neck
|
19
|
38%
|
|
Inadequate heel support**
|
18
|
36%
|
|
Propensity for hindlimb suspensory problems
|
7
|
14%
|
|
Thin soles (radiographic assessment)
|
4
|
8%
|
|
Ringbone
|
3
|
6%
|
|
Coffin bone rotation
|
2
|
4%
|
* body score >7
** <40% of the shoe behind the center of the coffin joint
Note: the total number of horses exceeds 50 because some
horses had more than one abnormality. |